Looking back to
old-school films such as Aladdin, where punishment actually had a
consequence, I ask myself why harsher punishment in the UK is
snubbed.
Nowadays, it feels
that people are happy to commit crime; either for a ‘rush’ or
solely because of their lack of respect. What I say is, bring
something back that would mean something to the criminals. If there
is no doubt that someone committed murder or theft; why not take from
them what they stole.
Human-rights
activists have gone a step too far with encouraging equality when
such people are happy to commit crimes against others. In Aladdin,
thieves would have their hands cut off; sure, it wouldn’t be
pretty, but people would be much less likely to risk their hands, or
their neck.
Everyone should earn a
place in society, especially those in the so-called First-World
countries. Those people who opt out of caring for social conventions
should surely receive what they give to others. If I were to commit
a crime, I would expect hell and wrath to follow, not cable TV and
free gym membership for as long as I had my hand in someone else’s
purse.
Our economy suffers
while criminals are both in and out of prison so why protect the
leaches that hinder the rest of the pack? They are the ones that
hinder us out of personal choice; for their own gain and without care
for others, yet we are expected to ignore their choices and
care for those that wish to selfishly act without regard.
Looking at packs of
dogs, it’s easy to see a hierarchy where if one acts against the
others, it will be isolated and it won’t have the advantage of
being both in and outside of the pack. Why should we treat criminals
differently when they have acted unfairly to others? Why do they
deserve preferential treatment? How dare they receive more than they
sow and how do you expect people to pay for other’s selfish
choices. They ignore their humanity when it’s advantageous to them
but still expect humane treatment.
They are treated well
in prison; too well. They’re on a cruise
holiday that they’re expected to stay on. A cruise deal for
them that is free, without repercussions and one that can help them
network to enhance their criminal skills. These individuals should
pay for their misdeeds, not be helped to continue their ‘trade’.
I would even relish
bringing back the most extreme of punishments; guillotines, hanging,
death by fire. If there is no doubt in their guilt; in that there is
certifiable proof of their actions; stop them from sponging off the
rest of us and make them regret their actions. I see this as the key
issue; criminals at the moment have no regret because they have no
need to embrace it.
A lot of criminals
select the easiest choice and our Government allows them to continue
choosing it; there is no reason to stop doing what they do because
there is no actual punishment being delivered: If they are put in
prison, they have ‘bragging rights’ and can socialise with
like-minded individuals that can teach them additional
tricks-of-the-trade; and when they’re outside of prison, they put
them into practice until they go back.
If there is no justice
to these people, they will see that they are committing no crime so
what is the point of using a disciplinary system that is half-assed,
expensive and a criminal trade centre? Why do we pay for something
that doesn’t work? We need a powerful deterrence, one that isn’t
half-assed. One that says we will punish those that break laws and
are happy to cause crime.
There is an option for
us at this time: capital punishment. People who could be deemed
worthy of such a punishment don’t care about you or what good
you’ve done for your family; too many are psychopaths with no
social conviction and no leash.
This community isn’t
looking for an easy choice; we are looking for the right one. Bring
back social growth, safety and true punishment to those that are
comfortable to inflict harm upon the rest of us.